How to Remove Emissions in the Food Production Industry

Preventing a contaminant from entering the food chain is key to preserving human health. Which is why players in the food industry are pressured by regulators. In this article, we’ll digest the main emissions in the food sector and describe some real cases that demonstrate the cost-effectiveness of DESOTEC’s removal solution.

What's the Best Treatment to Remove Odours from Food Production Air Emissions?

It comes without saying that odours are the main course on the food industry’s pollution menu. This is particularly true for industrial plants located nearby residential areas. Many plants such as slaughterhouses, pet food and animal feed factories, coffee roasters, and breweries often receive odour complaints from their neighbours. The smelly ingredients giving off odour nuisance include volatile organic compounds (VOCs), ammonia (NH3), and dihydrogen sulfide (H₂S). 

To remove these odours, food businesses can harness the best available technologies (BAT) such as activated carbon filtration. In particular, standard or impregnated activated carbon can trap VOCs or inorganic odorous molecules into their pores.

Odour Removal Case Studies

Safe odour treatment at a food processing plant

A Belgian fish smoking company was subject to odour complaints from its neighbours. To resolve this issue, they initially opted for a fixed filter from a third party. However, after a year, the fixed unit caught fire during operations. This likely occurs because of the discontinuous production, often leading to hotspots developing in the filter bed, which are fanned when the air flow is restarted. Given that the fixed filter (made of plastic) and associated piping were completely destroyed, the company reached out to DESOTEC for a safer odour removal solution. We supplied an AIRCON 2000 filter (made of stainless steel) and installed our specially developed Inerti-box, which detects hotspots and automatically douses them with nitrogen. Since then, the filter has been operating seamlessly and there have been no odour complaints from neighbours. Read more.

Odour removal from slaughterhouses

A family-owned company in the Netherlands runs a slaughterhouse where pork is processed. The site includes closed tanks where intestinal waste is stored before being converted into fertiliser or destroyed, with vents to release the gases from the decomposition process. A bioscrubber was in place to remove odours from air emissions, but this was proving insufficient. As the factory is situated on the edge of an urban area, people living nearby complained both to the company and the environmental authorities about the odour nuisance. To eliminate odorous compounds (ammonia, dihydrogen sulphide (H₂S), dimethyl sulphide (DMS) and mercaptans) from their air emissions, the company tapped into DESOTEC’s expertise. As the flowrate to treat was very low (300 m³/h), we recommended our smallest filter, i.e. the AIRCON 2000. This proved to be very effective, removing 99% of the odorous molecules, thus satisfying both environmental authorities and those living near the site. Read more

What's the Best Treatment to Reduce AOX in Food Production Wastewater?

Adsorbable organic halides (AOX) contain chlorine, bromine, or iodine. Most of them are chlorinated, including dichloromethane (DCM), trichloromethane (chloroform), chlorophenols, chlorobenzene, etc. The most dangerous types of AOX are persistent organic pollutants (POPs) such as polychlorinated biphenyls (PCBs) and dioxins. Typical emission sources of AOX in this sector encompass cleaning surfaces and equipment for producing and preparing food. 

As for odours, activated carbon filtration is considered as BAT to remove AOX as well. Thanks to their high surface area, activated carbon adsorb AOX onto their porous structure and effectively remove these molecules from wastewater.

AOX Removal Case Study

Reducing pesticide residues from the manufacturing of crop protection chemicals

A factory making crop protection chemicals needed to reduce AOX levels and pesticide residues in its wastewater to very low legal levels before it could be transported to a nearby treatment plant. In addition to this, AOX components all fluctuated, meaning that any decontamination solution had to be flexible enough to deal with them. Considering the situation, the company chose DESOTEC’s Mobicon unit, one of our largest mobile activated carbon filters, as the most suitable purification solution. This proved to be effective at treating AOX peaks of 300 mg/L, reducing their level to below the legal limit of 0,2 μg/L. Read more

What’s the Best Treatment to Purify Food Production Wastewater from COD?

Chemical oxygen demand (COD) includes a series of substances (both biodegradable and non biodegradable) which can be removed via oxidation. These encompass pesticides and POPs, among others, and are released into wastewater when rinsing food. If not removed from wastewater, COD will harm marine wildlife. In addition to this, COD could also disrupt bacteria in wastewater treatment biofilters. 

Activated carbon filtration is a BAT to decontaminate food production or processing wastewater from COD. Relying on the adsorption mechanism, activated carbon is able to capture these contaminants, which are not efficiently removed by biological treatments.

COD Removal Case Study

Reducing wastewater COD levels at plastic recycling company

An Italian company recycles plastic food packaging. The washing and recycling processes result in wastewater containing a COD concentration of around 600 mg/L. When increasing its rate of production, the client found that its fixed activated carbon filters were unable to cope. DESOTEC converted the client’s unit to use sand, which filters out the suspended solids from the wastewater. Next, a MOBICON mobile filter was installed, thus reducing the COD levels to 150 mg/L. Read more

Which are the Solutions to Remove 1,2,4-Triazole from Food Production Wastewater?

1,2,4-triazole is a common breakdown product of several fungicides used in agriculture. While effective, triazoles are known for their high chemical stability and low biodegradability, leading to several environmental concerns, including soil contamination & water toxicity. Leaching into groundwater or entering surface water via runoff, triazoles pose serious risks to aquatic life. As concerns food plants, triazoles are released into wastewater after rinsing products.

Exposure to triazoles can damage human health, therefore their emissions are being increasingly restricted:

  • Groundwater Directive (2006/118/EC): 0.1 µg/L per individual pesticide; 0.5 µg/L for total pesticides;
  • Drinking Water Directive (2020/2184): 0.1 µg/L for any individual pesticide; 0.5 µg/L for the sum of all detected pesticides;
  • Zero Pollution Ambition: under the European Green Deal, the EU aims to reduce the overall use and risk of chemical pesticides by 50% by 2030.

 

While triazole is generally subject to the 0.1 µg/L precautionary limit, some regions have issued temporary relaxations. For instance, Belgian authorities raised the limit to 1 µg/L in 2025 to manage a water supply crisis.

Wastewater treatment plants (WWTPs) can’t treat triazoles because they receive a too high volume of water to decontaminate. On the other hand, triazoles may be removed upstream at the food producer level where the volume to treat is lower.

DESOTEC’s 1,2,4-triazole Removal Solution

When it comes to triazole, it would be best to eliminate its contamination at the source by using an alternative fungicide, but it could take years to find an adequate replacement. In the meantime, food plants should invest in cost-effective removal technology. 

According to DESOTEC’s lab tests, activated carbon has proven its efficiency at removing 1,2,4-triazole, as low as under detection limits. Further specific tests can be done for each customer’s application to assess the best type of carbon to use to optimise the removal efficiency of 1,2,4-triazole.